Health Body

Body fat calculator

Last reviewed 23 Aug 2026 ·Method: US Navy circumference equations (Hodgdon & Beckett), with Boer lean mass as a cross-check.
Sex
Height
cm
Weight
kg
Neck circumference
cm
Waist at the navel
cm
Hip at the widest
cm
Women only
Body fat 27.8 %
Very leanAthleticFitnessAverageAbove average
US Navy circumference method
Category average
Fat mass 21.7 kg
Lean mass 56.3 kg
Boer lean mass estimate 54.1 kg
BMI for comparison 25.5
US Navy circumference · ±3 points

The tape method is only as good as the tape work. Measure first thing in the morning before eating, keep the tape level and snug without compressing, and take the waist at the navel rather than at the narrowest point. Repeatability matters more than absolute accuracy: this method is roughly ±3 percentage points against a DEXA scan, but it tracks change reliably if you measure consistently.

Bands differ by sex; the category row above uses the correct set for the sex selected.

A tape-measure estimate, accurate to roughly ±3 percentage points against a DEXA scan. It is far better at tracking change over time than at giving an exact figure.

Advertisement
320 × 100

The US Navy method estimates body fat from height and circumference measurements — neck and waist for men, plus hips for women. It is accurate to about ±3 percentage points against a DEXA scan and needs nothing but a tape measure.

How to measure body fat with a tape

1 Measure first thing in the morning, before eating or drinking.
2 Take the neck just below the larynx, sloping slightly downward at the front.
3 Take the waist at the navel for men, at the narrowest point for women, plus hips at the widest.
4 Keep the tape level and snug without compressing the skin.

Circumference methods work because fat distributes in predictable places, and the difference between waist and neck carries most of the signal. What they cannot do is distinguish an unusual build: someone with a very thick neck from training will read leaner than they are, and someone with a naturally narrow one will read fatter. Because those errors are consistent for a given person, the method is markedly better at tracking a trend across weeks than at pinning down a single number.

Questions

Roughly ±3 percentage points against DEXA. Consistent technique makes it reliable for tracking change.

Hodgdon JA & Beckett MB — Prediction of percent body fat for US Navy men and womenACE — body fat percentage norms
Advertisement
300 × 250
Was this tool any good?
INTERNAL SIGNAL ONLY · WE USE IT TO FIND TOOLS WORTH REBUILDING